The 21st century has seen its fair share of innovations in almost all industries. The construction industry, in particular, has seen one of the most revolutionizing innovations called the 3D house printing or rather called additive manufacturing. It entails the use of gigantic house printers that utilize thicker concrete that dries up fast and thus gives the house its shape and rigidity in a short period of time. This method of construction has been known to have more benefits than the traditional ways of construction thus it has gained more prominence in the industry.
Benefits of 3-D House Printing
One of the most crucial aspects of construction is the cost of manufacturing the products aside from the time of manufacturing. It has been estimated that 3D house printing can save up to 70% of the cost of manufacturing compared to traditional forms of manufacturing. This can be credited to the low packaging and shipping cost involved with 3D house printing, cheaper material that has proven to e reliable and finally, less human resource involved. Even though critics argue that the cost of acquiring a 3D printer is way more expensive, it is important to put into consideration the priceless experience and flair of printing your own house and further constructing it at a very low price.
One unique feature about 3D printers is that they are able to construct a house without the need of any special tools. This means with just the use of that single printer, you are able to mix the materials and construct the house without the use of other materials. This allows to cut down on waste and helps reduce the carbon footprint of the construction of the house. Additionally, this saves a lot of money as you won’t have to buy other different tools. So it’s a win-win for your pockets and the environment.
It’s rather absurd to compare the speed of 3D house printing to the traditional means of construction. Both methods will successfully complete the job but the time taken to complete the tasks using both methods is incomparable. To start with, 3D house printing takes only hours to manufacture the materials for building. On the other hand, traditional methods could take a matter of weeks or even months to manufacture the materials. In the construction business, time is money and the sooner a task is completed, the greater the cost to be saved which is not the case with traditional house construction. Additionally, it takes only less than 48 hours to complete building a house which can’t be said about the traditional ways of house construction.
The best thing about 3D house printing is that you won’t waste any materials, either when building or when manufacturing the construction materials. Additionally, 3D house printing ensures that it only uses the materials it requires thus ensuring that there is no waste. One more thing is that this method ensures the house built is much lighter than houses built using the traditional method. Finally, less waste means less impact on the environmental.
Mistakes in the construction industry are always very costly. Compared to the traditional ways of construction, 3D house printing guarantees a much better and safer house than the traditional method. After all, machines are more accurate than humans. Due to controlled mass production by 3D printers, there are few faults compared to the faults that humans would make which eventually affects the quality of the final product.
What do you think? If you can/could afford it, would you opt for 3D house printing or manual labor to construct your dream home? Have you operated a 3D printer before? What are your thoughts?